Home » Facebook threatens to remove news from US platform

Facebook threatens to remove news from US platform

by admin

Facebook has publicly threatened to remove news content from its US platform if Congress systematically imposes payments on publishers and broadcasters to distribute news content to major technology groups.

Warning is Facebook short-lived This was an attempt to defy groundbreaking legislation that seeks to change the terms of trade between publishers and platforms.

Warning from Facebook Parents, metaon Monday, after a long-debated bill seeking to empower American newsgroups was attached to the National Defense Authorization Act, making it much more likely to be enacted.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said: “If Congress passes the disrespected journalism bill as part of the National Security Act, we will not be subject to government-mandated negotiations. , will be forced to consider removing the news entirely from the platform,” he tweeted.

“No company should be forced to pay for content that users don’t want to see. It’s not a meaningful revenue stream,” he added.

This standoff reflects the tougher stance Meta has taken in adjusting its approach to paying for news and fighting tough regulatory requirements globally.

Meta has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on journalism in recent years and signed dozens of deals with newsgroups around the world. But it has long resisted regulatory moves to mandate payments.

As efforts to get big tech platforms to pay for news are spreading beyond Australia, Meta plans to change its approach to publishers in the next few years, and when its existing license agreement expires We are informally telling you that it is unlikely to roll over.

The US bill, known as the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act, is modeled after the Australian government and calls for Facebook and platforms like Facebook. Google Enter into licensing agreements with newsgroups or enter into an arbitration process to determine fair compensation.

Unlike Australia, the bill’s sponsors are primarily designed to support smaller news providers and local news organizations, rather than major national publishers such as Dow Jones or The New York Times. says there is.

The News Media Alliance, a trade association of US publishers, said Facebook’s threat was “undemocratic and inappropriate.”

“These threats were attempted before the Australian government passed a similar law to compensate the press and were unsuccessful, with the news media ultimately being paid,” the NMA said in a statement. increase. “Australian law has given the local journalist countless jobs and her $140 million to the press, which is equivalent to billions of dollars in the United States.”

Related Posts

Leave a Comment